On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:15:26AM +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > I argue that "amend-branch" and "mechanism to help with long lived branches" > is > really the same thing. The problem with long lived branches is the conflict > resolutions that accumulate and mess up things, and amending the history to > remove the conflicts is what is needed, and is hard to do because of > dependencies. The non-conflicted case is handled transparently by darcs even > without any kind of special command.
I'm in favor of amend-record on steroids, but just want to point out (maybe the obvious) that it is not a general solution for the long-lived branch problem. It works if the "branch" is a single repo, but it doesn't scale with the dynamic behavior of darcs, i.e., a group of people working on separate copies of a "branch". -- Tommy Pettersson <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
