On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:29:20 -0300, Maurício wrote: > I would like if we could name sets of patches in a repository , and we > could choose to work only on one of the sets (and its dependencies, of > course). One problem we often have with darcs is conflicts. Such > feature would allow us to delay merges to when we have time to work on > them. By merge, I say just joining two sets into one. We could also > push or pull patches to no set at all, so they would just be there > until we decide to include then in a set.
Perhaps the darcs pull --union, --intersect and --complement features could do what you're looking for. > (I've been using mercurial these days, but I really miss darcs. Things > were a lot more fun when I used it.) That's why we're fight to make darcs worth switching back to. Thanks! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
