Hi, On Tuesday 26 May 2009 20:30:39 Eric Kow wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:29:20 -0300, Maurício wrote: > > I would like if we could name sets of patches in a repository , and we > > could choose to work only on one of the sets (and its dependencies, of > > course). One problem we often have with darcs is conflicts. Such > > feature would allow us to delay merges to when we have time to work on > > them. By merge, I say just joining two sets into one. We could also > > push or pull patches to no set at all, so they would just be there > > until we decide to include then in a set. > > Perhaps the darcs pull --union, --intersect and --complement features > could do what you're looking for.
As I interpreted the message, he's talking about branches in one repo (with possibly a relation to something like 'git stash'). Mauricio, do I paraphrase you correctly if I say that you want to be able to have the working copy reflect only a subset of all the patches present in the repository? Regards, Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
