Hi, 2009/6/3 Gwern Branwen <[email protected]>: > There isn't any schema I know of. You really just have to parse it > kind of ad-hoc. Like in my Filestore code abstracting over darcs > (maybe you could use it), I just looked at the XML generating code in > darcs to see that the output is pretty much fixed - when you've seen > the nodes for one change from --xml-output, you've seen'em all.
I've skimmed through Filestore, and it seems like a good solution for now. What I am confused about though is the absence of schema... How come proponents of static typing provide untyped data? Cheers, Artyom Shalkhakov. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
