On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 16:17:11 +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > Alternatively, we could have a version used by createItem without the > dirlen field and a general version which takes a mandatory field. I > don't know if this would lead to something ugly though.
In case that came out as being completely nonsensical, I meant a version of the peekItem function, not the Item record (also s/field/argument/) peekItemCreate :: ForeignPtr () -> Int -> IO Item peekItem :: ForeignPtr () -> Int -> Int -> IO Item -- which uses peekItemCreate But maybe that is just ugly. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
