Nathan Gray <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:55:32AM +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: >> Moreover, I should start looking into getting us a new pristine format that I >> have promised in my application (the indexed working directory is, obviously, >> just a part of the whole deal). > > If I remember correctly, this has to do with setting up a subdirectory > structure for the files in the pristine cache, so the files are not > all in a single directory. Partially. It is also about packing up the many small files into bigger chunks, so http transfers are more efficient (ie. fewer roundtrips and less overhead).
> I am wondering if the same approach can be used with the patches > directory. Yes, we expect patches to use the same storage system as we have for pristine. Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
