Nathan Gray <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 06:20:39PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> I guess it's also worth noting that rollback's semantics changed pretty >> radically in the darcs-2 format -- it used to be a low-level thing, but >> now it just creates ordinary patches. > > I have come across times when I need to rollback a patch after it has > already become part of a tag. This is currently not possible to do. > It would be nice if I could record an inverse patch even after a tag > has been created.
I agree; I think this restriction is a historical holdover from darcs-1 that should be dropped. Nathan, please file a bug so we don't forget about it. (If you file the bug, you'll be notified when it closes.) _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
