Nathan Gray <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:02:06AM -0400, Max Battcher wrote: >> ``darcs repeal`` sounds silly to me, but I actually would be >> interested in a better name for rollback, _if_ we can find one (and >> one that isn't revert). I think rollback might be better used/more >> often used if it had a more descriptive name that emphasized the idea >> of recording an inverse of (part of) a patch. I don't have any good >> suggestions yet. > > If it's building an inverse patch, the command could just be: > > darcs invert
Either "darcs invert" or "darcs reverse" sound OK to me. (The latter due to the isomorphism with "darcs diff | patch --reverse"). I guess it's also worth noting that rollback's semantics changed pretty radically in the darcs-2 format -- it used to be a low-level thing, but now it just creates ordinary patches. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
