Hi all, I vote against taking a leap of faith and releasing a quick 2.4 with the hashed-storage code. I think we should merge the code into the mainline as quick as possible, trying to review it for at most a few weeks. After that, we should be running the darcs with hashed-storage as our own daily darcsen to test the code until the 2.4 release, and fix issues as they arise. That way we can be reasonably sure that it will be as stable as every other darcs release.
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 20:08:56 Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > Is the situation currently that we don't have a reviewer for the code? > (Sorry, I haven't been keeping up with the precise situation) Ganesh, can you tell us some areas that are in need of further review? I, and hopefully others, may be able to look at those. Regards, Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
