On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Kamil Dworakowski <[email protected]>wrote:
> > Good point that notification is the week point of this method of > communication. I think the reason for the wiki page was simply that it > was hard to follow the thread, especially that there was mentioning of > some off the list discussion and that at some point the title changed. > I was also not helping by repeatedly replying just to the author > omitting the list. I think I have this impulse already under control > and now that we have all the current context on the wiki we might > continue the discussion on the mailing list. Anyway, I am happy either > way, though wiki might have more latency obviously. I shall try to > follow irc too. > My reply is going to be a fair bit off topic now, but after I sent that message, I realized that a good hybrid-compromise would be a bug tracker built on top of darcsit, as long as it had a good bug tracking interface. Here are some things it could excel at: 1) Distributed and offline usage 2) (optional for users) Integration with CLI tools 3) (optional for users) Web interface 4) History 5) Good searching 6) Support for local customizations I marked 2 & 3 and optional meaning, I would like it offer both and let the user decide which to use. Not a project I want to start, but I could see it being popular. Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
