On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:20:22AM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Jason Dagit <[email protected]> writes: > > My reply is going to be a fair bit off topic now, but after I sent that > > message, I realized that a good hybrid-compromise would be a bug tracker > > built on top of darcsit, as long as it had a good bug tracking interface. > > Here are some things it could excel at: > > 1) Distributed and offline usage > > Distributed bug tracking is hard to get right. In particular, it is > hard to be performant and scalable. A precis of existing work is at > > http://lwn.net/Articles/281849/ (May, 2008)
Another attempt is SD (Simple-Defects): http://blog.bestpractical.com/2009/08/prophet-and-sd-07-cavil-are-now-available.html -kolibrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
