On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Ben Franksen <[email protected]>wrote:
> Jason Dagit wrote: > > It's possible that regex-pcre gives better performance than regex-posix > > I made some tests using the new criterion package (excellent for stuff like > that) and found regex-pcre to be faster by a factor of 3 to 9, depending on > regex and test string. I did not test it with darcs, but I took some random > regexes from the standard boring file and a random file with a long path. > I agree about criterion. Thanks for checking on that, it saves me some time. Did you use Strings or ByteStrings? Does anyone know if regex-pcre works on windows? Thanks, Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
