Jason Dagit wrote: > <[email protected]>wrote: >> Jason Dagit wrote: >> > It's possible that regex-pcre gives better performance than regex-posix >> >> I made some tests using the new criterion package (excellent for stuff >> like that) and found regex-pcre to be faster by a factor of 3 to 9, >> depending on regex and test string. I did not test it with darcs, but I >> took some random regexes from the standard boring file and a random file >> with a long path. > > I agree about criterion. Thanks for checking on that, it saves me some > time. > > Did you use Strings or ByteStrings?
Strings. Cheers Ben _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
