On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Nathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:12:06PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: >> So could I get a benchmarking volunteer for each of these platforms? >> It would be extremely helpful if you could respond by the end of this >> week :-) >> >> - MacOS X >> - Linux >> - Windows > > I can benchmark on Linux (debian on i686). > > I would also like to see darcs1 in the comparison. We have not > upgraded yet because we have large repos. It would be nice to > know if darcs 2.4 is fast enough compared to darcs1 for us to > consider upgrading.
Which is more important to helping you make the decision: 1) darcs 1.x binary vs. darcs 2.4 binary on a darcs-1 formatted repo; OR 2) darcs 2.4 binary comparing darcs-1 format speed to darcs-2 format speed? I suspect that #2 will be included but #1 is more work for benchmarkers (only because darcs 1.x is pre-cabal and thus harder to build for many people). It valuable to know up front which you are expecting so we can plan for it in the benchmark. Thanks, Jason _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
