On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Nathan Gray wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:01:27PM -0800, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Nathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
I would also like to see darcs1 in the comparison. We have not
upgraded yet because we have large repos. It would be nice to
know if darcs 2.4 is fast enough compared to darcs1 for us to
consider upgrading.
Which is more important to helping you make the decision:
1) darcs 1.x binary vs. darcs 2.4 binary on a darcs-1 formatted repo; OR
2) darcs 2.4 binary comparing darcs-1 format speed to darcs-2 format speed?
Currently we are running darcs 1.x on a darcs-1 format repo. We
would like to upgrade to darcs 2.x and convert to a darcs-2 format repo.
BTW, you can convert to the hashed repo format without changing the patch
format to darcs-2 ; that'll maintain interopability with version 1 repos.
Apart from conflict handling, I wouldn't expect any speed differences
between darcs-1 and darcs-2 patch formats.
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
