On 22/12/09 17:12, Eric Kow wrote:
So could I get a benchmarking volunteer for each of these platforms?
It would be extremely helpful if you could respond by the end of this
week :-)
- MacOS X
- Linux
- Windows
I've just built the latest darcs so that I could use --skip-conflicts
(it's great!).
I'm doing all my work in hashed repos locally, and my perception of the
performance is that it's "different" to darcs-1 format repos. Some
things are very fast: whatsnew, pull/push --dry-run. Other things seem
to crunch my disk a lot and take a lot longer than I would expect. For
example, I just pushed a few patches from one GHC repo to another and it
went like this:
Shall I push this patch? (7/7) [ynWvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: y
Writing inventory 3 done, 30 queued.
0000330575-fa3eaa4bf6ddc10a086115a0b3ad2aa2
Writing inventory 4 done, 29 queued.
0001980260-fa47963e3f314d52c3e1aa9136e00cd0
Writing inventory 33 done, 0 queued.
0000218257-06c742c93d020a1c3bbac14af46a1c8e
Finished applying...
Push successful.
why is it writing *all* of the inventories? This is perhaps related to
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1589. I thought the point of tagginng and
optimising is to avoid needing to write the old inventories?
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
