On 09/01/10 18:41, Eric Kow wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 13:47:32 +0000, Simon Marlow wrote:
I've just built the latest darcs so that I could use
--skip-conflicts (it's great!).
Go Ganesh! :-)
I'm doing all my work in hashed repos locally, and my perception of
the performance is that it's "different" to darcs-1 format repos.
Is it usable? Would you be willing for GHC to switch over to hashed
everywhere, replacing --partial with --lazy for the buildbots? It may
be good to apply the latest version of patch72
http://bugs.darcs.net/patch72
and see if it makes a difference.
With a local filesystems it is usable, but I need to test it at work
with my NFS-mounted home directory.
My general perception is that many things are quicker, but operations I
would expect to be instant (and were very quick with darcs 1), like
pulling/unpulling 1 patch in a GHC repo, are taking several seconds with
hashed repos and darcs 2. I've tried optimize --reorder, to no avail.
This is resulting in an overall impression of sluggishness, which is
unfortunate.
Cheers,
Simon
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
