Nathan Gray wrote:
...
line I do not want
==BEGIN
line I do want
==SPLIT
line I do want
==END
line I do not want
==BEGIN
line I do want
line I do want
==END
line I do not want
Or we could just get rid of ==SPLIT and only use ==END and
==BEGIN, if that makes it more clear.
interesting. And in this proposal, I think the "lines" should be
prefixed with + or - (add or remove). It would be sweet if you could
just delete the patch-lines you didn't want to record, although I'm
worried that darcs might not be able to reconstruct which particular
patch-lines you meant to keep (if there are duplicate lines). Or the
user could prefix "include" or perhaps "reject" lines with a * or
something like that. (Which interface is most efficient depends on the
size of the hunks, the text-editor, etc.)
hmm...
-Isaac
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
