On Mar 18, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Jason Dagit wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Daniel Dickison <[email protected]> wrote: > > Daniel Dickison <[email protected]> added the comment: > > On Mar 17, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Jason Dagit wrote: > > > Jason Dagit <[email protected]> added the comment: > > > > Could we please get a status update? Looks like this one has been sitting > > since about mid-January. > > > > Thanks! > > Jason > > Back in January I added new test cases to patch135 to test 'whatsnew', > 'record', and 'add' with various variations of _darcs and _darcs/foo. Let me > know if there are other possible regressions that it needs test for. (Though > I can't really help with the code, unfortunately.) > > So then, if the tests pass we can be reasonably confident that this fix is > ready to go? > > Jason
I'm far from being a darcs expert so I was hoping someone more knowledgeable could chime in here. I just don't know if these changes are safe or if the tests cover enough situations. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
