Eric Kow <ko...@darcs.net> added the comment: On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 12:04:42 +0000, Matthias Kilian wrote: > > 4. Look into the matcher name. Log seems fine, but just in case > > it may be useful to have another thought about it. Trent suggested > > 'description' in his issue1769. > > Changed.
Argh, I just thought of something! The problem with 'description' is that darcs send uses 'description' to refer to the patch bundle description; whereas what we're looking for is what record calls the 'long comment' What do you think we should do? Call the matcher comment? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 ---------- title: Documentation for `hunk' and `description' matchers -> Add support for matching against log messages __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <b...@darcs.net> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch222> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
