On Jul 15, 2010, at 1:08 pm, Eric Kow wrote: > But maybe something new will come up? Maybe the best way to achieve this sort > of Conceptual Integrity (bang!) really is to implement some sort of darcs > stash/unstash command. Or perhaps instead such a command would be obviated by > in-repo branching. Or maybe something completely different, some completely > brilliant and laterally thought approach to the Work in Progress problem.
FWIW, this is similar to my pair-rotation problem: * Three people, A, B and C, are working on a problem * A and B pair on B's machine * A and B end with WIP in B's repo * A wants to pair with C on C's machine * B has to transfer WIP to C's repo... how? Currently we use a shared Dropbox folder and do this (2-3 times per week if there are 3 of us, massively more often on the rare occasion we had 4 people at the same time): * B records patch "WIP - UNRECORD" * C pulls "WIP - UNRECORD" * C unrecords "WIP - UNRECORD" * B obliterates "WIP - UNRECORD" What we'd really like to do is: repo-a> darcs stash ../repo-b That would be fully awesome :) Ash -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
