On 07/19/2010 06:23 AM, Eric Kow wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:11:26 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
What we'd really like to do is:
repo-a> darcs stash ../repo-b
Interesting. So what would the whole workflow look like?
In case that was unclear, the question was related to that
command above.
Basically, who types darcs unstash, where, and what happens
next?
This all seems like some of the talk that has previously occurred about
patch history rewriting and patch "superseders" for trading around
unfinished patches. Right now, it seems to me that Ashley Moran's use
case could mostly be handled by normal patch exchange and amend-record
to move from work-in-progress to "releasable" patch states.
The complications is that there is still issues with trading around
patches that have been amend-recorded, and that it can be tough to
amend-record "old" patches once dependence relationships happen.
Certainly many other options have been discussed (rebase, patches that
can "replace" or "wrap" others in the change history, etc) in the past.
--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
