On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 19:01:25 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > In March, there were three or four people using the darcs library, a > veritable explosion :-). With at least two of them, questions about > things like filtering lists arose. Things have gone a bit more quiet > again since then, but I do feel that nipping any dangerous usage in > the bud is a good thing. > > >Just seeing if this code making it to stable is itself urgent > >or if by urgency we're mostly just talking about Darcs hackers. > > In my view, there is some urgency in it getting into stable for the > library. For the executable, changing HEAD is fine.
In that case (and despite it being a way off before we'll get any maintenance benefits), I guess I would somewhat uncharacteristically say "punch it" (let's flip that switch as soon as you feel we can reasonably do it) (I might even go so far as to say that we should go ahead and flip both switches at the same time if that makes life any simpler) Of course, that's just me... :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
