On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Reinier Lamers wrote:
Hi,
Op woensdag 21 juli 2010 07:38 schreef Ganesh Sittampalam:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
The immediate question, of course, is what we should do for 2.5, but I
think
the arguments above apply at whatever time, the only question is of the
relative balance between urgency and risk.
I think this thread has reached consensus that we should enable witnesses
for the library (only) in 2.5, so I've submitted
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1896 and a patch to go with it. Now would be a
good time to shout if you do object!
I object. Let's library-using code that's working with the HEAD at branch time
working with 2.5.
But then, I don't feel very strongly because there are so few library users.
I'm not too fussed either. Since you're the release manager we should
just go with your view. I've bumped the bug to 2.6.0.
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
