On 9 Aug 2010, at 17:57, Eric Kow wrote: > Try telling Darcs that you do want to rollback the depending patch. > (darcs rollback -p or --match to make it easy to pick out the patch > and its dependencies).
Ah... so doing -p on an old patch will include only the dependencies to get that patch? I understand now, but I still find that a bit confusing. I think my dream darcs interface to this would be to present all patches, and interactively ask if you want to roll back the dependencies too. That way you don't need to know in advance whether the patch has dependencies (which can be hard to guess for large patches). > Keep in mind that the new Darcs 2 rollback is equivalent in effect > to doing things by hand, so you should feel no qualms about saying > you want to rollback a dependency that you actually don't. It's an > efficient way of generating patch, no conceptual difference from using a > text editor and doing darcs record. I actually assumed that, I never realised Darcs 1 did it differently! Cheers Ash -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
