On 10 Aug 2010, at 14:55, Eric Kow wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 15:21:58 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: >>> There are 2 patches that depend on this patch. >>> Shall I rollback this patch? (3/3) [ynW...], or ? for more options: y >>> OK, will also roll back its two dependents > >> I like that! Nevertheless, I might want to see *what* patches depend on >> it. : - ) Also useful with unpull and send.
Petr- I also like that! It behaves exactly how I'd expect darcs to behave, based on existing interactive commands. > How about this? > > There are 2 patches that depend on this patch. Hit 'i' to see them. Eric - If you mean this: There are 2 patches that depend on this patch. Hit 'i' to see them. Shall I rollback this patch? (3/3) [ynW...], or ? for more options: y OK, will also roll back its two dependents Then that looks good to me! Can I suggest that "s" should skip a patch and any depended-on patches? That way, if you know / have a good idea which branch of patches you old patch was in, you can eliminate a big chunk of the interactive choices. If this makes sense, though, it would be polish rather than a core feature. Cheers Ash -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
