-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> >> It seems like a 'darcs pull --bundle <foo.dpatch> <some repo>' command >> would be nice here. It would take the patch names from foo.dpatch, but >> ignore the contents, and pull the patches from <some repo> instead. > > I would suggest that Petr implement a pull --bundle (since he'd be a > good user of the submitted branch if we went this route). > > Florent had a more general mechanism, but one which sounds harder to > implement. What do you think, Florent? From a UI Skeptic point of view, > should we, just implement pull --bundle for expediency now, and worry > about the 'in' matcher later? > I'm not sure the "in" matcher is that much harder to implement, so i bumped it on top of my todo-list (at least the --match "in bundle" rather than --match "in repo"). I still think pull --bundle feels unclean from a conceptual point of view, so i'd prefer not to see it in a released version of darcs. Florent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyPVxkACgkQTCPcDztjGo4EDwCfary0A7K18Ejm2FDvT478iBDR Cv8AniO+ozIQiOdp7vBzkeXPiRz8MlhR =3tIR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
