Hi all, Op dinsdag 14 september 2010 12:32 schreef Eric Kow: > Florent and Reinier, as active reviewers, do you have opinions to > contribute about doing something like this in principle?
I am afraid that this is not going to make the review process faster, and possibly slower. But I can see how it will help us avoid queus full of outdated conflicting patches. So at least we can try it out. I think I slightly prefer only reviewing the final result of the adventure branch in the end to this submitted branch. That way Petr and the rest of us could work happily until the big merge of the adventure branch. If Petr keeps pulling patches from HEAD into adventure, the conflicts at the end should not be bad. Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
