Thank you guys for the various inputs on your git workflows. Also, the "Understanding Darcs" page made me realize I already considered revert as an undo command, hence why I never looked for unrevert.
In a conversation I (gh_) had with Petr (mornfall) today on IRC, it became clear that implementing "darcs stash" should not be tried before we have a real in-repo branching ( see http://irclog.perlgeek.de/darcs/2011-04-04#i_3453527 for details, until 12:30). Especially (mornfall's words): > Stash *is* multi-head repo. > It is just an UI optimized for very short branches. > Nothing much else. So the short-term options are being narrowed down to: - keep unrevert as it is now and improve documentation - only remove warning message, and update unrevert documentation to say unpull and amend will "erase" the unrevert patch - remove unrevert (leaving door open to revert -O to enable cheap and fallible stash-like workflow) Enough talking from me on the topic, you know where I stand. I'll be happy to improve the documentation in any case. Guillaume _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
