> I'm interested about how revert/pull/unrevert is a good workflow with > regards to git stash / pop.
I'm happy with either, although I find revert/unrevert easier on the brain. (git reset --hard HEAD. Ugh.) > So one question for you git users: How is the darcs revert / pull / > unrevert workflow better than just pulling and resolving conflicts in > the working copy? That's not what I use it for. I'm hacking on a feature, and suddenly I realise there's a bug for which there's a one-line fix: darcs revert -- fix bug make make test darcs record -a darcs unrevert Note that the darcs revert is necessary, since my tree might not even compile when I notice the bug. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
