On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Pete Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Roman > > Sorry to get in at the end here, but I have a tarball that's been > getting ignored for quite a while too.Would you please tell me the > actual uri I need in order to create an issue in redmine? Tracker = "Camera Support" Subject = "Noise profile: ${Camera maker} ${Camera model}" https://redmine.darktable.org/projects/darktable/issues/new
> I know it's > not your issue, and I'm glad you are trying to help, > but it would be > really great if this info were actually published with the instructions. > This is way more difficult than it needs to be and certainly not > efficient. It is, yes. But the noise profile review throughput is severely limited too... > Does anyone actually own new hardware support? That's how it > would be done in a normal business. Might work for DT as well... Did not parse that. > Thanks > > Pete Hall Roman. > On 09/08/2016 05:40 PM, Terry Duell wrote: >> Hello Roman, >> >> On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 20:17:27 +1000, Roman Lebedev >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Terry Duell <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hello All, >>>> For those who have seen the post below but ignored it, sorry to keep >>>> harping >>>> on this subject, but having generated the data and made it >>>> available, it >>>> would be nice to get just one response. >>>> I thought I was following the guidelines in making the data >>>> available this >>>> way, but if not, please point me in the right direction so we can have >>>> profiled denoise support built-in for the K-1. >> >>> Seemingly-best way is to create new issue in redmine (camera support), >>> attach the tarball, and just wait... >>> >> >> Thanks. >> >> Cheers, > > -- > Pete Hall > [email protected] > 608-290-0731 > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
