Hi Dan, thanks for your suggestion and your interest.
To your suggestion > Perhaps a simpler version is best: sort order associated not with a > particular "collect images" filter but as another column in the "images" > table. This would cause less worry about a lengthy join and indexing on a > TEXT column in "custom_image_order". And once "places|beach" is given a > custom sequence, it will maintain that even if the collection is further > filtered. And somewhat maintain that sequence for other collections which > overlap it. This would also not leave "ghost" custom image orders laying > order when a tag or film roll is deleted. On the other hand, it wouldn't > allow for creating tags "sequence|v1" and then "sequence|v2" with utterly > different orders. I like your idea to simplify it. So I will implement it that way. First a version without the tags. Worth updating https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/9641 with a note of > your progress/interest, to add to the record. Easier to search redmine than > the mailing list. I'll check that. Thanks again and best regards, Mario ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org