On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 21:09, Richard Hobday <rlhob...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > You might benefit from changing the settings in: > Preferences/processing/auto apply pixel workflow defaults > this should allow you to the revert to the legacy pipe order.
I thought that setting changes which modules get auto-applied (base curve or filmic+exposure or none). There's a 'module order' setting in the darkroom (below the modules, above 'more modules') that allows you to switch between 3.0 and legacy order -- however, in that respect, 3.2.1 did not bring any changes, did it (that is, the order of modules between 3.0 and 3.2 is the same, is it not)? However, wouldn't raster masks solve the original poster's problem? E.g. one could create a 'dummy' module instance early in the pipe (like exposure with no actual change of the exposure), create a mask, and re-use that mask as a raster mask for any number of modules that come later in the pipe. Any modifications (e.g. changes to exposure) done after the 'dummy' exposure module would leave the raster mask unchanged. https://www.darktable.org/2019/12/darktable-30/ 'Raster masks add a new mode that allows you to reuse a mask from one module to another module. This is particularly interesting with parametric masks: copying the parameters from one module to another would not have been enough because the same parameters do not select the same pixels depending on where you are in the pipe. The raster mask reuses the mask directly, so it does not have this problem. Warning: The raster mask can only take a mask from a module preceding it in the processing chain. [...]' Kofa ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
