Hi, thank you for all the hints I got. Since there are always questions, I have already answered in previous mails, I decided to summarize everything from now on in every mail. Additonally I have constructed an example, that shows my problem in a more dramatic way.
My workflow in 3.0.2 I'm using parametric masks very early in my workflow. This way the definition of the mask does not depend on global changes I am applying later. If I would do it in opposite order, I would constantly need to adjust the parametric mask, which is very time consuming and inconvinient. I'm very happy with my workflow, and I'm glad that I can do this with darktable. The following screenshot shows the (constructed) example. The module "tone curve parametric mask" is below "shadow and highlights“: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.11.05.png And here is the same situation with highlighted mask: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.11.28.png Upgrade to 3.2.1 After upgrade to 3.2.1 the order of modules was very different from what I saw in 3.0.2. For me that means, that the parametric masks of hundreds of images are not the same as in 3.0.2. Finally that means, that the processing of some hundred images is destroyed now. Here is the screenshot of the example image after upgrade to 3.2.1. Module "shadow and highlights" is now below "tone curve parametric mask", which destroys the parametric mask of this module: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.16.33.png The same with highlighted mask: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.16.52.png After changing the module order to "legacy" it became worse. Now are two other modules before "tone curve parametric mask“: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.17.26.png And again, the same with highlighted mask: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-13+um+07.17.47.png These are the hints I got and I have already tested: * changed setting of Preferences/processing/auto apply pixel workflow * changed module order from custom to legacy If you are curious, that is the image how it should look like: https://www.flickr.com/photos/149577772@N07/50217006456/in/dateposted/ Best regards Andreas > Am 13.08.2020 um 00:26 schrieb Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net>: > > Le jeudi 13 août 2020 à 00:21 +0200, Andreas Herold a écrit : >> Screenshot 3.0.2: >> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-12+um+23.02.54+Kopie.jpg >> Screenshot 3.2.1 custom: >> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/orbifgwd23sgzw8/AAC3SjlwjRe-LvLhX7U5UZBaa?dl=0&preview=Bildschirmfoto+2020-08-12+um+23.24.53+Kopie.jpg > > Those two screenshots are looking very similar. What is the issue? > > -- > Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) > > The best way to travel is by means of imagination > > http://www.obry.net > > gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
