On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > >> parafin already fixed ru.po: >> >> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/947e88f5e12cddcfbc19c3adcd3c0fdaddef380d
And this :) https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/commit/31cfce9062a7f4bb6d69a661820c85c36f9919c4 As translations between between master and darktable-1.1.x had already diverged... > Based on the patch all I can say is that i18n implementation in > darktable is fscked :) I already mentioned that. But I doubt there's a good fix within short-term reach, so now we have to deal with it... > A fuzzy translation should not be considered at all. There are very > few applications that do otherwise. In fact, until recently Ardour was > the only other one I knew of. But I guess that's a policy thing? Is there any way to guard against that? Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
