Jose, > We have to think also about corner cases. To name a few:
Sure! Devil are in the details :) > + What happens if the user caches some images, process them "offline" > and then plug the external storage back but forgets to sync them back. There is nothing to forget since there is nothing to do :) > He will keep editing the cached images, or having the last edits in > the laptop, but those images won't never synced back. No, as soon as the image is back online it will be used for the editing and entering darkroom will create the xmp with latest editing (those done offline for example). > + What happens if a user make some local edits, and then exports the > images and removes the filmroll from dt, forgetting that there are > cached images (or because of the previous point). The database won't > know about the removed images, but the xmps won't be synced back, even > if they are written in cache dir. To remove a film roll one has to remove all image from it. Removing an image removes the development process from the database. Since there is no xmp created for local copies we do indeed loose the editing done offline. We should probably forbid removing an image if the original is not online. How does that sounds? -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
