Hmm, can't confirm here. Inclusive mode and all polarities set to negative gives an empty (zero) mask; exclusive mode and all polarities set to positive gives a fully selected (all one) mask.
Can you please supply a screenshot? Ulrich Am 17.09.2013 11:07, schrieb Pascal Obry: > I've been reviewing the documentation for 1.3. > > I have a problem with "3.2.8.2. Usage" about mixing masks. > > It is said for "Inclusive mode" > > <<< > For this mode you set the “combine masks” combobox to inclusive and > make sure that all > polarity buttons of all the individual channels and of the drawn mask > are set to negative > ( ). Your starting point is a mask where all pixels have a value of > zero, i.e. no pixel is > selected. >>>> > > But if I do exactly that I have a full yellow mask on all my pictures, > which means all pixels are selected. > > It is said for "Exclusive mode" > > <<< > n the opposite case you set the “combine masks” combobox to exclusive > and make sure > that all polarity buttons are set to positive ( ). Your starting point > is a mask with all > values at 1.0, i.e. all pixels selected. >>>> > > If I do exactly that I get no selected pixels. > > Is the documentation wrong or the implementation mixed-up? > > Pascal. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99! 1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
