Hi Am 05.11.2013 09:37, schrieb johannes hanika: > maybe the noise in that image would need an additional threshold on > sharpness, depending on iso/noise sigma from our noise profiles. fwiw i > didn't see any problem with my camera up to iso 6400. maybe it's because > your input is a processed image? The input image is a raw image the processing was done completely in dt. But, you are using the embedded jpg? Here the embedded jpg is black and white. No idea if that matters. But if noise is basically a problem, I think this is the cause.
I just exported the embedded jpg with dcraw -e and imported this jpg in dt. I wanted to see, if it makes a difference, but the focus areas are not shown here... I guess, it is not implemented for non-raw files, yet? (same for scanned tiff files) Then I switched to another image (a raw file), the focus areas were shown as expected. http://www.meterprosekun.de/dtfocusscreens/focus6.jpg Going back to the extracted jpg, exactly the areas from the latest raw file are displayed: http://www.meterprosekun.de/dtfocusscreens/focus7.jpg I assume, that some data are not resettet? Sören ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
