Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014, 13:37:44 schrieb Pascal Obry: > 2014-02-10 13:07 GMT+01:00 Tobias Ellinghaus <[email protected]>: > > Maybe we should ask a different question first: Do we want to keep the > > tagxtag table? People have complained about the tag ordering a few times, > > and that table is only used to make educated guesses to propose tags that > > are more likely to be assigned. If no one uses and/or likes that feature > > we could as well drop it and get rid of all that code. > > I do use quite a lot the tagging module and found this feature really > nice (I come > from Lightroom which has the same feature BTW). So I'm really against > removing this feature.
OK, so there are people that use and like it. Case closed. :) About fixing the table: Since it can take quite some time this is nothing we should put into the upgrade path of dt's database, no one would like to wait an hour when starting dt. However, since this is a one time thing it might be enough to provide a script on the website, maybe along a short news post? Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
