On 07/04/14 14:55, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
Hi!
>> I can understand why it may be undesirable to have, perhaps multiple
>> instances of, the cli concurrently accessing the database when the gui may
>> be active - if the cli updates the database..
>>
>> Does the cli need update access to the db?
>
> No, and using anything from the database is certainly not advised. If I ever
> find the time I will probably rewrite dt-cli to not use a database at all and
> maybe even skip the usage of dt_init() so that the --core would go away, too.
> That is all just slow and bloat. That tool isn't meant to be a remote control
> of darktable (using --core --library ~/.config/darktable/library.db you could
> even import images from the command line without having a running dt around)
What is bad about this? This can could in quite handy... IMHO there is
no need to strip this entirely.
--
Kind regards, / War is Peace.
| Freedom is Slavery.
Alexander Wagner | Ignorance is Strength.
|
| Theory : G. Orwell, "1984"
/ In practice: USA, since 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
