On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Dennis Gnad <den...@xorn.org> wrote:
> On 28.02.2015 13:08, Josep Vicenç Moragues Pastor wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I've seen now this was already tested in Darktable four years ago:
> >
> >
> http://darktable.org/redmine/projects/darktable/repository/revisions/ea3575e5109bcc6d72185e66994944f0a4f3527a
> >
>
> Wow, I would have exactly the same request from a user side. Can anyone
> comment why this is not in darktable now? Got it removed again (but
> seems it's not in the history of the master branch), or was it just
> never working good enough?
>
it was slow, not really well integrated (libclarity had some weird wiring
in the build system), and the default results were more ringing than
sharpening. i'm still not convinced by deconvolution results in general,
but another module somewhere probably doesn't hurt. as mentioned before,
porting that old stuff to new dt api or reimplementing it is probably not
enough to get a degree for it.
-jo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
darktable-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
