On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Patrick Rudin <[email protected]> wrote: > Denis Testemale <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I gave a shot at this test, out of curiosity, and can't really >> understand the results because they seem much better than the ones >> published (especially test 2 and 3), > > Well, number 1 are the modules equalizer and denoise. And i did it with > darktable 2.0.7.
> Michael created tests 2 and 3 himself, only god knows which modules he > used. But he used darktable 2.2.x do create the xmp, so i guess there > are some (not visible) errors if you use it with darktable 2.0 More important detail is: in 2.2.0, we completely changed XMP layout, and bumped XMP version. So *any* older dt version should not even be able to load the XMP from 2.2.0 ... > Run the "benchmark" with darktable-cli, and you will see the full > output. > > Personally i don't mind if some card is 0.3 seconds faster than another > card. I guess it is interesting for many people to see which > card/driver-combination is working. > > So far, i have seen good results from nvidia 760/1060 and higher as > with radeon 370x/rx460 and higher. What about older and cheaper cards, > what about passive cooled cards, do they bring any advantage over cpu? > > Regards > > Patrick Roman. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
