hi, are you using the `high quality export' setting in your preferences? there were some changes wrt preview pipeline buffer processing.
http://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch08s02.html.php#d0e13310 cheers, jo On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Ger Siemerink <g.siemer...@gmail.com> wrote: > you crop your image into 900px and export it with 71% jpg quality and you > show us a 93% image and compare that with the DT view and are amazed > why not compare a 900px and a much higher jpg quality and 100% view? that > would be more fair > > regards Ger > > 2017-01-14 5:15 GMT+01:00 <darkta...@911networks.com>: >> >> On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:14:39 -0800 >> "I. Ivanov" <iv3...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Try append to history in the export setting. >> >> There's a slight improvement, not much. But it's related to 2.2.1 >> >> I just reprinted an 2.0.4 image today with 2.2.1. Lot >> less sharp: >> >> http://i.imgur.com/8Ujo8SN.png >> >> The color/tone is cooler, lot less sharp but with 2.2.1 I have the >> watermark preset which is frame+watermark. I only used watermark in >> 2.0.4 >> >> >> -- >> sknahT >> >> vyS >> >> ____________________________________________________________________________ >> darktable user mailing list >> to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
