you crop your image into 900px and export it with 71% jpg quality and you show us a 93% image and compare that with the DT view and are amazed why not compare a 900px and a much higher jpg quality and 100% view? that would be more fair
regards Ger 2017-01-14 5:15 GMT+01:00 <darkta...@911networks.com>: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:14:39 -0800 > "I. Ivanov" <iv3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Try append to history in the export setting. > > There's a slight improvement, not much. But it's related to 2.2.1 > > I just reprinted an 2.0.4 image today with 2.2.1. Lot > less sharp: > > http://i.imgur.com/8Ujo8SN.png > > The color/tone is cooler, lot less sharp but with 2.2.1 I have the > watermark preset which is frame+watermark. I only used watermark in > 2.0.4 > > > -- > sknahT > > vyS > ____________________________________________________________ > ________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@ > lists.darktable.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
