* I. Ivanov <iv3...@gmail.com> [01-17-17 11:52]: > > > On 2017-01-16 02:15 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2017, 22:22:12 CET schrieb I. Ivanov: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I stumbled on an odd behavior. DT 2.2.1 on Ubuntu 16.04. I did the > > > following: > > > > > > 1. Have a folder on the local drive with 200+ images all corrected > > > everything is good. > > > 2. Removed the images from the collection > > > 3. Copy the images on a NAS share (my archive location) > > > 4. Imported them and noticed not all thumbnails look right. > > Did you ever copy back an older library.db? What you describe can happen > > when > > image ids get "reused" internally, i.e., when there was another image before > > with the same id which put its thumbnail into the cache. > > > > [...] > I only have one library. I process them when they are on the local HDD. Once > they are done - I would remove them from there, move them on NAS (it is > actually a USB drive connected to the router) and re import the images from > this "archive" location. > > I do such a workflow in order to gain speed (local drive is SSD) and the > "NAS" is slower.
Why not use dt to "move" the files and continue maintaining them the dt's library.db? Seems like a lot of extra work the way you describe. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo @ http://linuxcounter.net ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
