Hi, I think your problem is Firefox, not darktable. If Firefox has to scale an image by factor 6,something, it is going to do it roughly and throw away stuff. If the Gnome image viewer and darktable agree, then your system seems to be setup alright.
Try uploading a correctly sized image for the web view, that should come across right (more or less). Cheers Michael Am Di 17 Jan 2017 21:19:47 CET schrieb Jeena <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > > I see JPEG is on https://jeena.net/photos/265 . > Yes, the direct link is: > https://jeena.net/system/photos/photos/000/000/265/original/kallbadhuset-varberg-night_08.jpg > > and this is a JPEG which does look like the edit preview in Darktable > when I look at it in GNOME Image Viewer but loses the details in > Firefox, which is better than what I had before, where it didn't have > the details in GNOME Image Viewer either. What I changed was the > export profile from sRGB to Adobe RGB (compatible). > > > Can you share raw, JPEG-from-dt, XMP (and possibly screenshot with > > explanations) for others on the list to see ? > here is the RAW: http://jeena.net/t/darktable-raw.NEF > and here the xmp http://jeena.net/t/darktable-raw.NEF.xmp > > > The effect is real in both your examples. I observe similar > > differences when processing my photos from Nikon cameras. They do a > > whole lot of processing finetuned by in-house color specialists and > > engineers. first thing to do is not to expect darktable to match > > manufacturer-specific result. > I don't think I'm doing that. I take the RAW, import it into > Darktable, edit it until I like it, then I export it and the JPEG > result doesn't look like the thing Darktable was showing me while I > was editing. That is why I tried to get help on the mailing list. I > don't quite know what a "manufacturer-specific result" is. > > I uploaded also a annotated version of my first image > https://jeena.net/t/darktable-export-annotated.png in which "1" is > the cloud which one can see in the Darktable preview but not in the > browser, and "2" is the blue gradient in the water which goes down > much further in the Darktable peview compared to the image in the > browser, where it's almost black down there. Also the house is > brighter in the Darktable preview. > > > I personally would first consider changing the base curve. DT > > offers two base curves for Nikon, "like" and "like alternate", I > > guess you have tried them already? > No I don't think so, I'm also not sure if this is advice to make my > editing better or to try to make the dfiierence smaller between > Darktable preview and exported JPEG? I am aware of the fact that I'm > not good at editing yet, but I'd like to find out how I can get the > same picture out as a JPEG as Darktable is showing me while I'm > editing. > > /Jeena > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] -- Michael Below Rechtsanwalt www.judiz.de ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
