I've tried that, but any change I make using the tone curve just makes
the issue worse.
On 2017-03-29 05:51, Andrew Martin wrote:
Per,
What about adjusting the blue half of the B channel in LAB using the
"tone curve" module? This will operate on only the blue parts of the
image.
Andrew
On 28 March 2017 at 09:22, Per Östlund <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 2017-03-28 16:01, Remco Viëtor wrote:
On mardi 28 mars 2017 14:49:09 CEST Per Östlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've digitized my father's collection of old slides with the
camera +
> macro lens + light table method. Most of the images look fine,
but some
> images with certain blue hues are giving me a headache. I'm
guessing the
> issue is that the light table I built used LEDs with a poor color
> spectrum for the task, causing the blue channel to blow out.
>
> As soon as I touch e.g. the levels module I get the usual issue
that
> very saturated blues turn black. Using the gamut clipping
option in the
> input color profile module fixes that particular issue, but
doesn't do
> anything for the colors otherwise.
>
> The best solution I've managed to come up with so far has been
to set
> the input color profile to "linear Rec709 RGB" which heavily
desaturates
> the image, and then increasing the saturation a lot with the color
> correction module. Hardly an optimal solution, but with some
tweaking I
> can usually get the colors to look approximately the same
except that
> the blues don't clip anymore.
>
> This method can require quite a lot of tweaking to look good
though, so
> my question is if someone knows of a better way to handle this
issue
> (besides reshooting with a better light source). Here's an example
> RAW-file (don't mind the blur, that's from the original slide):
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/6mshjycwm4n10xa/img_014.ARW?dl=0
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/6mshjycwm4n10xa/img_014.ARW?dl=0>
First the good news: as far as I can see you have no blown
channels in the raw file, even the blues stay within range of the
sensor. The bad news is that with the default settings, a large
part of the image gives 'out-of-gamut' warnings. And to be
honest, the image looks over-saturated.
So what I tried was:
- set base curve to 'leica' (less aggressive than the Sony
default, esp. in the highlights).
- set gamut clipping to 'adobeRGB' (or sRGB).
then I used two copies of 'contrast brightness saturation',
- the first for a global saturation correction of -0.2,
- the second was at saturation -0.35, with a parametric mask
limiting the effect to the blue colors: 'b' channel from
-128/-128 (full left) to -29/-3.
Thanks, I tried your settings, but to my eyes it makes the image
too dark without really fixing the issue with the blues.
If all slides are similar, you could set this up for one slide
and the create a style to apply those settings as a base to others.
Unfortunately not, I already have a style which fixes the issue
somewhat, but usually have to spend a lot of time fixing
individual images.
But would it be possible that the original slides have faded a
bit over time, and especially the red dye?
Very possible, the example slide is about 40 years old.
Unfortunately I don't have access to the slides at the moment.
Good luck,
Remco
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
[email protected]
<mailto:darktable-user%[email protected]>
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
