> Message du 19/07/18 20:43 > De : "Jean-Luc CECCOLI" > A : "Darktable Users List" > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [darktable-user] Skulls - yes, once more ! > > > Message du 18/07/18 13:16 > > De : "Patrick Shanahan" > > > A : "Darktable Users List" > > Copie à : > > Objet : Re: [darktable-user] Skulls - yes, once more ! > > > > * Jean-Luc CECCOLI [07-18-18 05:00]: > > > > Message du 17/07/18 23:34 > > > > De : "Patrick Shanahan" > > > > > > > * Jean-Luc CECCOLI [07-17-18 14:40]: > > > > > > Message du 17/07/18 13:04 > > > > > > De : "Patrick Shanahan" > > > > > > > > > > > > * Jean-Luc CECCOLI [07-17-18 05:12]: > > > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > now it sounds like you have an install problem, probably with lensfun or > > lensfun's version not matching. iirc dt uses lensfun to identify camera > > bodies and lenses. you haven't commented on what exiftool/exiv2 identify > > your cameras and lenses as. > > I finally could do it. > Copied folders containing the files processed on 16.04 and those processed on > 14.04 in a dedicated folder, then ran a script that extracts make and model. > For all pictures, exiftool reports NIKON CORPORATION as make and NIKON 1 V1 > as brand. > The same for exiv2 for Exif.Image.Make and Exif.Image.Model. > There, I don't understand : if DT relies on exiftool, how cant it retrieve > information different from what exiftool reports ? > > I am totally lost... :-(
Here is a link to download such pictures : https://we.tl/tXAnOAe30G OK.rar contains the photo from the computer where it is correctly displayed, while KO.ra contains the same photo (though renammed) on the comuter where it displays as a skull. Both together with the sidecars created upon import process. I doubt it will show anything, but, who knows ? About having an install problem : how can I check what depends on what ? Regards, J.-Luc ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
