Personally, I'm OK with converted CR2 → DNG, it works fine from my experience. But I have problems with NEF → DNG, there is some problem with maker notes interpretation in exiv2 (used by dt) which leads to problems in lens detection (hence no automatic lens correction). I know that some developers strongly oblige against conversion, but I find it useful on big collections — 15-20% size reduction does matter for me.
Timur. On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 7:39 AM Mike Strock <[email protected]> wrote: > What do I lose converting from CR2 RAW files to DNG? I always shoot raw > but is there a benefit or a degradation to converting to DNG for future > proofing my images? > > If this is off topic I apologize. > > Mike. > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
