I've never tried the script against an image with no identity. I'll have to "create" one and see what happens.
The Super-Takumar 50mm f1.4 is in the lensfun database. Bill On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 11:07 AM Anton Aylward <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/12/2019 21:14, William Ferguson wrote: > > There is a way to work around the mis or non identification of lenses. > > > > I've written a lua script to correct the lens information in the image > database. > > Oh WOW! > > This might be a route to soling a problem I have. > I favour using 'antique' lenses. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rgp1Tfikv0 > with either adaptors or remounts > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kaN4Fj16wA&t=334s > And in particular the Pentax Takumar 50mm 1.4 on my Sony: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGH-Y4n0vSA > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omeyL_siN8E > > The point of all of this is that these 'antique' lenses do not communicate > with > the camera body. AT ALL. > Not only are they 'not automatic' in any sense of the word, not only can > the > camera not adjust the aperture or the focus but the lens doesn't report its > setting, nor does it report an identity. > > So you import an 'anonymous' image into DT. Hopefully you remember which > lens > you were using and hopefully it is in the database. > > Oh, is the Super Takumar 50mm 1.4 there? > yes, for Sony E-mount, not A-mount > > > -- > Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will > do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone. > --John Maynard Keynes > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > [email protected] > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
